Star Trek Computers Aren’t All That Retro

leonard-nimoy-obit-videoSixteenByNine540-v2

Spock at his computer station.

Last month we talked about Star Trek: The Original Series miniskirts, how they came to be and what they signified. While researching the paper that eventually turned into that post, I found out some interesting things about technology too. Most sci-fi isn’t actually futurist, meaning it doesn’t actually attempt to predict the future in an accurate way. Most sci-fi is designed to make a social statement by taking a situation to an extreme, or to explore possibilities by asking scientific what-if questions, or both. It’s not meant to be a “history of the future.”

Star Trek did those social things, and fantastically well. It’s famous for them. However, it also turns out that Gene Roddenberry, creator and showrunner of Star Trek, was an enthusiastic futurist who wrote papers on the future of technology and was invited to lecture at NASA as well as several universities and colleges. While Star Trek was first and foremost a fantasy of space travel, Roddenberry was interested in presenting concepts he actually found workable and likely to exist in the future. One of his most important ideas was the Enterprise’s central computer, described in this pre-production memo:

More and more I see the need for some sort of interesting electronic computing machine designed into the U.S.S. Enterprise, perhaps on the bridge itself. It will be an information device out of which April and his crew can quickly and interestingly extract information on the registry of other space vessels, space flight plans for other ships, information on individuals and planets and civilizations, etc. This should not only speed up our storytelling but could be visually interesting.

yourprops

A typical personal computer station. YourProps.com

The final version of the computer was not a physical object on the bridge, but could be accessed from several bridge stations, personal interfaces in crew quarters, and from other locations. Like most science fiction creators, Star Trek writers did not predict the rise of the internet, touchscreens, or even modern Graphical User Interfaces, so characters frequently refer to “tapes” and even use paper printouts for analysis on occasion.

The attitude toward computing is old school too: Computers are for math and for looking up information in databanks. While monitor-like screens offer books for business or pleasure, no one on the Enterprise bridge is playing Galaga or IMing their friends — not even anyone in the rec room. Computers, or rather THE computer, are for professionals, and information comes in discrete chunks that the computer can receive, provide, or compare.

0b5Gk-1452010589-587-blog-Star-Trek-Image-1024x536

Kirk contemplates some microtapes.

Still, though, it’s worth noting that crewmembers have the advantage of a practically-infallible voice-control capability, so anyone can ask the computer for that information without a specific skillset. Plus, the central computer that can be accessed from multiple locations is actually a very important step toward the internet or a basic computer network. This is one of several cases where Star Trek directly influenced the course of technology, since Bill Gates has pinned his inspiration for personal computer operating systems on those shown in Star Trek.

The colorful, unmarked squares referred to as “microtapes” are often mocked for resembling floppy disks, but actually predated them, since even 8-inch floppy disks were not produced until 1967. The concept of removable storage was itself new at the time. Likewise, teleconferencing was hardly common in 1966, but is used about as often as voice intercom onboard the Enterprise, and is the default method of communication between space ships. The large, flat viewscreen at the front of the bridge has even been called a precursor to modern plasma screens, and while the technology used for such a thin screen was never described on the show, it fits perfectly into Star Trek’s sleek, ultramodern, seamless aesthetic.

MainViewerRearProjection

Still from “Spock’s Brain” showing the main viewscreen used to display a map.

Finally, a word on communicators. In function they resembled radios more than phones as we think of them today. You can’t leave a voicemail on a communicator, there’s a system of shared frequencies rather than individual numbers, and ALL you can do is talk on them. but as with Bill Gates’ computers, flip-phone inventor Martin Cooper has cited Star Trek communicators as his direct inspiration. Flip-phones and the idea of portable connectivity eventually led to modern smartphones: the ultraportable, ultrapowerful information innovation that Star Trek supposedly failed to predict when it “left out” the internet.

I used to laugh because Star Trek thought it was so futuristic, using floppy disks and computers without screens. Turns out I was all wrong: Star Trek wasn’t mimicing old stuff and hoping we wouldn’t notice, it came first and helped create the technological landscape we live in today!

Advertisements

18 responses to “Star Trek Computers Aren’t All That Retro

  1. Reblogged this on The New Emma Jones Society and commented:

    On original Star Trek computers and the history of technology — the remaining points of interest out of that “Star Trek and material culture” paper. 🙂

    Liked by 2 people

  2. True, most science fiction does not attempt to predict the future, but place today in tomorrow’s setting for the purposes of storytelling and philosophical exploration, but some of the greats such as Jules Verne and H.G. Wells did just that. Jules Verne has a character who is laughed out of an aeronautical society for proposing heavier than air flight. H.G Wells wrote of a future that had a worldwide communication system startlingly similar to the Internet.
    Fast forward half a century or so and you have Poul Anderson’s Flandry of Terra Series. It is about the rise of a new starfaring species competing with a waning humanity. There is some of the superpower analogy (as it was written in the 60’s), but as a supporting character mentions about a war between two sentient species on a strategically vital planet, those species likely evolved over millions of years as enemies and a peaceful resolve is unlikely.
    ST: TNG and the other later series attempt to deal with problems of a futuristic nature. One example dealing with security over networked computers is the episode where Picard and some others are transformed into children and he can’t get access to a schematic of the Enterprise. Very relevant as several years after it premiered Columbine occurred.
    Data and the Borg are a look at how we deal with AIs. For the most part that has not come to fruition. Unless you count our exasperation with Data is comparable to that of ours with Siri

    Like

  3. “The attitude toward computing is old school too: Computers are for math and for looking up information in databanks. While monitor-like screens offer books for business or pleasure, no one on the Enterprise bridge is playing Galaga or IMing their friends — not even anyone in the rec room. Computers, or rather THE computer, are for professionals, and information comes in discrete chunks that the computer can receive, provide, or compare.”

    I wonder how much better off we might be had we kept computers and the internet just a bit more at a distance from our personal lives. I’m sort of kidding. But it’s worth considering.

    Liked by 1 person

    • I’m a digital native, so I’m not the person to ask unless you want a ramble/rant. 🙂 I spend most of my time trying to explain digital life to older generations.

      Liked by 2 people

      • Sure, there is hardly a way back to a so-called “simpler time,” unless one creates one off the grid, etc. It’s definitely a subject the original Star Trek dealt with: the reality, or unreality, of the virtues of some golden age of yesteryear.

        Liked by 2 people

        • The Next Generation dealt with some questions about that, and about virtual versus reality, with the addition of the Holodeck. Poor Barclay, in particular, was usually the one this centered around… But the characters in general would often head back to a “simpler time” in their recreation.

          Liked by 2 people

  4. Pingback: I was nominated for a “Unique Blogger Award” | Blue Towel Productions

  5. Just finished reading your Post/Article. I loved the content you and thought you put into it, it was very worth my time to read. I think in a lot of ways you are so right about this. I look forward to reading more of your material. ^_^

    Like

  6. I never really watched TOS growing up, I was always a TNGer. However, since the BBC has been showing the TOS eps, I’ve been watching them… I have to say, I’m not exactly riveted by any of the story lines, but I find the predictive nature of the technology fascinating. I’ve always known TOS came WAY before any of the modern tech, and in my opinion they did an amazing job of showing us what it could look like, and we did the rest. For that, I am appreciative, despite the fact that I’m rarely entertained by the episodes now that I’ve gotten the general gist of what the tech can do. Although, I must say, they do a good job with character development as well. There’s a lot to like, it’s just that it doesn’t hold my attention quite as well as TNG. Plus….Q. Yeah.

    Like

  7. Hi,

    Rightly explained !. Nice Blog
    It always give new idea.The information about drop my link is beneficial for me and other. Thank You
    http://www.getitfix.net/

    Like

Don't Feed the Trolls....

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s