More Options, Narrow Focus

Something that I have been noticing lately are people announcing that they will be blocking others on Facebook for various reasons. Now I completely understand that there is no reason that we need to take time with people who drag us down, but online we have the ability to completely block even seeing that any of that stuff exists. This means that we can shape our life online to only include those people or things that reinforce our perspective of the world. Yet, what does this mean for how we deal with the wider variety that we might experience outside of these online circles?

Self-Imposed Isolation

The choice to remove viewpoints from your life, even if just online, means that you are choosing to isolate yourself. Now it is not to say that this is a bad thing, but it is something we need to be careful of. At one point do you cut back too far and potentially cut yourself off too much? When you are isolating online it is not about cutting yourself off entirely, but cutting out anyone who you feel does not fit into your views or beliefs. It can be used to just cut out the extremists from your life or to narrow your focus in the world.

Potentially Narrow Focus

The problem that I see potentially is that if we narrow our focus of the world too much than are we missing out on the different viewpoints in the world. If we only surround ourselves with people who believe and think they same way that we do are we just living in a never ending echo chamber of the same thoughts. Thus, reinforcing that these thoughts are the true right way to think about a situation. Does this potential echo chamber also make us less likely to even hear other views on a situation?

Civil Discourse Might Die

The ultimate issue with this is the possibility that civil discourse might end up dying. In some ways I feel like we are already headed this direction. Now-a-days it is not so much about having a conversation, but being the person who yells their idea the loudest, often calling the other person names to distract from any points they might have. It is not about points and counterpoints, but instead the attack of the individuals. Name calling is the way to argue a point of view instead of an open discourse. The more we potentially isolate and narrow our focus, I feel like the more likely this is to be the case.


What is so funny about the act of cutting ourselves off from information is the fact that the Internet gives us so much more access. In some ways cutting off certain avenues is a natural outcome when there are almost too many open for us to contemplate. It would take a long time to explore all the opinions that are floating out in the web today and therefore it is easy for us to shrink our circle to only topics we care about and shrink even further to only people who think like us.

At the same time the world that we create online is not necessarily a reflection of the world around us. We can create clean separation and back off from things online, but in real life it can be much more difficult to make that separation. There are people we have to deal with in the every day life that online we might choose not to. I fully appreciate that dealing with people who are not willing to listen or have a discourse can be not worth our time. Are we helping things by people cutting themselves off from people disagreeing with them or is it allowing pockets of ignorance to persist?

3 responses to “More Options, Narrow Focus

  1. I would agree that we are headed in a direction in which civil discourse will soon perish. Many people, from a variety of different viewpoints, disengage with people that disagree with them and only view the information that suits their preconceived ideals. That leads into what I consider a huge source of the problem, which is the vast amount of false information out there. It’s polarizing, and the more polarized and distant we become from those we disagree with, the more likely (and often) these screaming matches and name calling will continue.
    I am still jarred by a situation a while along in which someone called me a bigot online. Without getting into details, a friend starting discussing something concerning culture and religion on Facebook (is really a good idea anymore?). With my experience abroad, I shared thoughts. A friend of his then called me a bigot because my ideas didn’t align with her rather narrow view.
    I think the pockets of ignorance grow larger everyday because the false information out there reinforces someone’s ideals. And it’s hard for me to tell the difference sometimes, too. While I don’t think it’s healthy for our community to cut oneself off from people we disagree with, sometimes it’s too toxic to have them in our lives. That being said, I’ve never blocked anyone, but because I have some more unorthodox views than most people I generally engage with, I am the one blocked.


  2. So my coworkers occasionally dig on me for getting most of my news via feminist websites. To be fair: these sites are committed to presenting and promoting voices that are silenced in mainstream media, particularly theses of QTPOC. I try to be a good role model of feminism on Facebook, but the emotional toll it takes for me to deal with transphobia, racism, biphobia and sexism has, in the past, outweighed my ability to maintain social media relationships.


    • Addendum: so I do get a huge range of opinions of people who are not like me, but am able to have a baseline perspective of respect and visibility. And we don’t always agree, though there is respect for diversity of opinions.


Don't Feed the Trolls....

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s