Iron Man 2 Revisited

After seeing Iron Man 3, and writing up my review, I went back and re-watched Iron Man 2. The most aligned of the Marvel Phase 1 movies, Iron Man 2 just doesn’t seem to fit.

There are some internal problems, I suppose, that might contribute. Like there not actually being much of Iron Man until the last half hour, although lots of Tony Stark isn’t really a problem. Except it was a dying Tony Stark, so the overboard elements without anything tempering.

But I don’t think this is the problem with Iron Man 2. The internal issues and plot are things that could work – and did work in their own way. It’s a better superhero movie than a lot of others – it just isn’t as good compared to recent superhero movies.

Spoilers ahead for Marvel Phase 1 and Iron Man 3!

So what happened?

The movies in Marvel Phase 1 accomplished a few things. They introduced us to the heroes, and got the origin stories out of the way. Then, like setting up a game of Fiasco, we had characters, and then were given an enemy, an object, and the location.

The location is our world – or close to it. Iron Man sets us very clearly in our world – with all its grittiness, with corporations, and military, with terrorists, energy problems, all sorts of things for our heroes to interact with. It’s kind of our world plus SHIELD, but once superheroes start appearing, some group is going to form to interact with or watch over them. But the stage is set for where the movies are happening.

Thor, then, presents us with a villain. The villain is out of this world – literally. With motivations that might be beyond us, but which are also quite human. With powers that are out of this world, but which are also based so much in simple discourse and sneakiness. Loki is a villain that just works really well, because he is a great combination of human and alien.

Captain America, then, gives us the object. Having seen Iron Man, we’re not surprised to find our past, with a few minor changes. Having seen Thor, then, we can accept the addition of Asgardian technology. So the Tesseract, in the hands of Hydra and causing all sorts of trouble, works. And it is powerful enough to be something worth fighting over decades later.

So then we get The Avengers: We have our heroes, with a couple of extra ones we’ve seen snuck in with Black Widow and Hawkeye. We have our location, in our world plus SHIELD. We have our villain, Loki, returned from cosmic crazyland. And we have our object, the Tesseract, which would solve the world’s problems – or, seems to create them. Everything comes together beautifully for a team to form, and a fight to ensue.

Oh, and The Incredible Hulk happens. Also kind of makes Iron Man 2 look alright. But it wasn’t as bad as it could have been – but the best Hulk movie was The Avengers.

Where does Iron Man 2 fit with this?

So there’s one more movie in this mix, of course, and that’s Iron Man 2. Except, unlike the others, it isn’t giving us an origin story (although they introduce Black Widow, except a Black Widow movie could have been amazing). It doesn’t add much of anything to our location, though we see Nick Fury a bit more. It doesn’t give us more about our villains, or the things they want.

In fact, Iron Man 2 does the opposite: it gives us a worldly supervillain. Tony Stark says that in the world no one will stand up to face him on his best day. So then Whiplash does, and voila, we have created a world with supervillains. It’s kind of the takeaway lesson from The Dark Knight: the hero creating the villain through his very existence.

So then, almost immediately, in the very next movie – Thor – we get introduced to the wider universe, to aliens, to alien technology, to things well outside of any threat that Whiplash or someone like him could offer. To a world beyond supervillains – because The Avengers exist to fight armies and demigods, not supervillains.

We’re Going Another Direction

Iron Man 2 seems like a case of deciding to go another direction with things. Laying out the world of supervillains, for instance, just to move past it and be done with it. This is referenced, even, in Iron Man 3 – they say that the Mandarin had to get so public and outrageous with his message to even be heard over the concern about aliens and invasions and generally everything from The Avengers.

But what else?

War Machine. War Machine is a big part of Iron Man 2. But he doesn’t make his way into The Avengers, and is not even who I would call the sidekick in Iron Man 3. He’s set up, waiting… and still waiting. But they’re kind of going another direction.

Black Widow. Black Widow’s character was okay in Iron Man 2, but she got depth and life in The Avengers. They could have done more, they did do more, and so this stands out as something that is clearly different later on.

Howard Stark and SHIELD. This is in part a tie-in with Captain America, and maybe deepens the world they’re in, but it’s also kind of just an internal plot point to the movie. Especially when what he helps do is build a new element, which is then made irrelevant in Iron Man 3 when Tony has the shrapnel removed from him and he no longer needs the miniature Arc Reactor to live. They went another direction with that life-saving beyond-the-grave move.

The Avengers Initiative. The big point about the Avengers Initiative being a thing is the closest that Iron Man 2 comes to giving us something that is a real and true lead-up to The Avengers. It’s the reason all these different characters get pulled together. It’s the unifying theme between these films that aren’t sequels to each other – something that really hasn’t been done before, and certainly not to this scale. Except, as a final crowning “we’re going another direction” item, the Avengers Initiative itself was scrapped, and is a no-go by the time The Avengers happens.

So love it or just kind of accept that it’s there, Iron Man 2 is the oddball Marvel Phase 1 movie. The choices they made there, and things they set up, did not come to fruition – unlike the threads they set up in Thor, in Captain America, and even, it feels like, in Iron Man or The Incredible Hulk.

I am excited to see where Marvel Phase 2 is going now, after seeing Iron Man 3 – time for someone else to be the frontrunner hero?

Advertisements

7 responses to “Iron Man 2 Revisited

  1. I think the problem is twofold. First, I’m not sure the producers saw the whole thing when they started “another comic book movie” (Iron Man). Thus they needed time to get everything together and may have needed to produce something in the Iron Man line just to keep people engaged in the interim. Second, Iron Man 2 fits into the Iron Man trilogy, separatefrom Avengers, but with some tie-ins. I see this hearkening back to their origins, where each hero gets their own storyline as well as the occasional crossover event (though they seem ever more present).

    My big question is whether or not they will be able to pull together engaging storylines for the others outside of the Avengers platform.

    Like

    • I think a big test is Thor 2, because of all of the Avengers, Thor has the least character development in The Avengers, in my opinion. He learned a lot in Thor, and The Avengers was just a chance to put it into practice. If they can pull off a good movie this fall, I have hope.

      And as long as Guardians of the Galaxy doesn’t seem like it’s just a Disney ploy for merchandising…

      Like

  2. To me, Iron Man 2 is the sacrificial lamb upon the altar for The Avengers. It allows that movie to not have to worry about setting up Black Widow or S.H.I.E.L.D., and it further hinted at the notion of the Avengers Initiative. As a result Tony’s sickness, feuding with Rhodes, and supervillain Whiplash all feel a bit perfunctory to a larger SHIELD story which is only being hinted at. By the way, great point about Iron Man 2 assigning Tony a super villain but the concept not quite fitting well in Phase 1 where Thor battles a god and The Avengers a god and his army. How would you categorize the Red Skull from Captain America?

    Like

    • Good question. After Thor, and with the Asgardian tech, it takes him from human-technology supervillain like Whiplash, and puts him in a different category. Whiplash can oppose a single hero, and with some programing, make some robots to cause some trouble. Red Skull found enough alien power to take over the world. And he wasn’t pointedly focused on our hero: it was our hero who had to be focused on the Red Skull. Larger than life. I need a word bigger than supervillain, I am realizing…

      Like

  3. I’m impressed, I must say. Rarely do I encounter a blog that’s equally educative and entertaining,
    and without a doubt, you’ve hit the nail on the head. The problem is something that not enough men and women are speaking intelligently about. Now i’m very happy that
    I stumbled across this in my hunt for something relating
    to this.

    Like

  4. Pingback: A to Z with Arnim Zola | Comparative Geeks

  5. Pingback: Batman isn’t getting an origin story… and I’m okay with that. | Comparative Geeks

Don't Feed the Trolls....

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s